I benefit from tourism, but more people from outside Khumbu now work in the industry, especially as guides and trekking agents. The competition is becoming difficult for local people.
I sometimes accept lower wages because I fear losing the job altogether. Outside workers may charge less, and get our jobs, even though we local guides know the landscape, communities and conditions in ways that take years to learn.
The people who know these trails best should not have to lower their price simply to remain employed on their own land.
The general cost of living has also risen. I believe lodges should consider lower rates for Nepali travellers than for international tourists. Government employees and poorer local people feel high prices most strongly.
Socially, I see few serious negative effects from tourism. Contact with visitors is valuable. We learn about other cultures and practise our English. Most tourists know the trekking guidelines and behave responsibly.
Many visitors are careful with the environment and do not leave rubbish or collect firewood. Sometimes they understand environmental behaviour better than I do, and local people can learn from their example.
Good tourism creates an exchange: I share my knowledge of Khumbu, while visitors sometimes deepen my understanding of conservation.
The physical impact on the land is nevertheless clear. More lodges require more stone, and more fuel demand means additional trees are cut. Anyone who has walked these trails for many years can see the difference.
Tourism should continue to employ local guides at fair rates. This keeps income within the community and gives tourists knowledge rooted in the place they are visiting.
Khumbu’s guides should not become bystanders in an industry built on the mountains, paths and communities we understand best.